Lessons from pound class

My wife and I go to a gym class called "Pound" most Saturday afternoons.  The idea is to take two drumsticks, and then do (according to the instructor) 500-600 assorted squats and lunges across 45 minutes of workout tracks - the drumsticks incentivise you to go lower so you can hit them against the floormats.  The first few times we did the class, my legs were literally wobbling!  Even now, every class leaves me on the edge of exhaustion...

One thing my wife and I are most amazed by, is the instructor's ability to keep up with all the exercises, while talking to us and whooping enthusiastically XD Even more incredibly, we know that this is her second class in a row - she teaches an hour of kickboxing just before our pound class!

The instructor doesn't really look like much - I mean, you'd think she'd look like Gal Gadot in Wonder Woman, but she just looks ordinary, I wouldn't even say she's particularly slim.  Then just last week, we had a substitute instructor who was even less buff.  But I'm dead certain that both instructors could easily beat me flat in any fitness assessment, because when I'm on the verge of collapsing, they're still leaping around and chatting merrily.  So, maybe a bit sadly, I suspect how good you look is probably mainly down to genetics.

I sometimes feel that way about my own exercise routine.  I have a habit of going all out, because I have so little time, so I exhaust myself in 25-35 minutes then rush to shower and get to work.  I know I pull a reasonable amount of weight/reps/pace yet I basically look like a wet noodle whereas there are some guys there who just seem to saunter around a lot and play on their mobile phones, but seriously look like they could give Batman a run for his money.  That doesn't seem fair :P

So my wife and I concluded that day that while our fitness routine (probably) does keep us fit, it really doesn't do much in terms of getting us to look like Batman and Wonder Woman, simply because of genetics!  But my wise wife, as usual, pointed out that even though we'll never be Mr & Mrs Singapore, we can certainly be better versions of ourselves.  In short, I may never be Batman, but I can be the best me.  So, still worth doing :)

In one of our late night chit chats, my daughter told me that in JC, the overwhelming majority of students are science students, and there are special programmes galore for high performing science students, while there're just two Humanities Programme classes, and a few other "arts" classes.  I explained to her that this was unsurprising, since our entire education system is geared towards identifying and rewarding students good in maths and science. 

Think about it - in primary school, besides two languages (English and mother tongue), the only other subjects are... math and science.  Too bad for anyone who happens to be good in poetry or history or geography.  So generally speaking, the good secondary schools get populated by students who are oriented towards math and science.  The same filtering process is repeated in many good secondary schools - most of the classes are maths and science oriented.  My son, for example, chose to take a subject combination that has the least number of science subjects - and it already includes two maths subjects and two science subjects out of nine.  Then in JC, as explained above, the vast majority of classes are science oriented again.

I actually don't have a problem in principle with this - I guess, as a policy, we've decided that our country and economy really need lots of maths and science oriented people.  Hopefully they're right.  I don't want to pretend I know better than our policymakers, whose full time job is to get this right!

But on a personal level, I do have a view of course.  My daughter asked me, if the country needs and rewards math and science people, why didn't she choose to do that?  And I explained - the best 1% of almost any skill will eventually get rewarded for doing what they do well.  The best artists, the best athletes, the best architects, the best networkers, the best lawyers, the best scientists, the best cooks, the best salespeople, the best teachers.  If you have amazing EQ - go do a job that rewards EQ.  If you have amazing IQ - go do a job that rewards IQ.

But my daughter astutely pointed out - some professions have a lower threshold for success.  Let's say for example doctors - maybe the top 50% of doctors still make a great living.  My daughter said - my math and science are good enough to get to the science class - so why not do that?

And I agree.  But, what are you great at? I asked.  And she admitted - she's great at her humanities subjects.  Even more importantly, she likes them.  Which again is unsurprising - it's natural to like something you're great at.

So the question to ask yourself is, do you want to be great, or just good?  If you pick something you're great at, then you have a chance to be great.  You can be the best you.  If you pick something you're just OK at, even if that route has a broadly higher chance of success, then all you can be is... good.  And maybe you'll never get a chance to be the best you. 

Having said all that: I recognise that not everyone has the luxury of making these life choices - sometimes, you have to play the odds, let's say because maybe you're the only one in the family who has the chance to get a stable job, or go to university.  In that case, maybe you do have to tell yourself, I'll take the safe route, and build a base for my children to one day have the chance to make this choice.  I think many parents (like my own) have made that choice - and that was them being the best parents they could be.  Because not all our choices ought to be dictated by me, me, me.

But in a nutshell - whatever our choices, all we can really do is be the best where we are.  We'll end up doing many different things, but whatever those pursuits are, we can always be the best version of ourselves.

"Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men"  Colossians 3:23

"There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit distributes them.  There are different kinds of service, but the same Lord.  There are different kinds of working, but in all of them and in everyone it is the same God at work."  1 Corinthians 12:4-6

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bullying? Stand up!

Image
When I was a kid, I remember being bullied a fair bit.  I was small for my age, bespectacled, shy.    The teachers didn't help by putting a target on my back by making me Vice Head Prefect.  I would get my stuff just taken away from me by bigger kids, dragged out into the field to be tickled until I collapsed (much less fun than it sounds), and pushed into the storm drains.  Not all the kids were full-blown bullies of course.  But I remember some of them standing by, and politely holding my spectacles (so they wouldn't be broken) while the bullies did their work on me. Most of this stopped when I got to secondary school, where a much larger proportion of my fellow students were now just as nerdy!  And of course I grew up too.  I don't really look back on those days with any kind of animosity, because I think it never occurred to me that it was unusual.  But I do think my experience made me a bit more sympathetic about people around me who...
Read more

Life as a pie chart

Image
Someone told me recently about a "life exercise" in which one compiles all the stuff that makes up your life, and puts it in a pie chart.  So let's say for me, something like this. The idea is to visually demonstrate to myself that, in the event I lose one of these things, then I can see that, hey life is not so bad, that wasn't such a big deal.  Say for example, if I suffered a blown ACL, and couldn't run or play basketball any more, like this: At first blush - I'd say, hey, I still have my wife, children, parents, career, church life - so, chin up, things are not so bad.  Pretty good life visualisation tool to bring some optimism back into play! ... But what if, a month later, something happens at work, and boom, career gets sidetracked, I lose my job, or get put in cold storage somewhere, like this: Oops, now only half my life is left!  With only half of life's meaning left to me, what do I do? And what if something happens to...
Read more

Family AND Team

Image
I heard an interesting viewpoint this weekend. A family is not inherently a team. Hmm.  Sometimes at work, often in church, and most of the time at home, you hear people say to each other that we are family. And often, we really are. We care for each other above and beyond transactional matters.  It matters to me when my colleagues and cell group members (and of course my actual family members) go through illnesses or family issues or work challenges. I root for their success at presentations and projects and relationships. I care about what they care about, even if it has little direct impact on my own life. In a way, a family is sort of an amalgam of people who support each other in pursuit of each member's personal goals. For example, as a father, I support my children in their academic, career and ministry goals. But where they go to school, the grades they get, and the careers and ministries they build - they're really their goals, not mine.  Ditto for my role as a c...
Read more